Investor Alert:
CIRO is issuing a warning to Canadian investors regarding Canada Token Trade.
The Canadian Investment Regulatory Organization (CIRO) is publishing guidance regarding Schedule 9 of Form 1, concentration of securities. Schedule 9 of Form 1 measures securities concentration risk and provides appropriate capital provisions to address securities concentration exposures.
This guidance:
This guidance includes sample calculations and a frequently asked questions (FAQs) resource attached as:
In this guidance, all rule references are to the Investment Dealer and Partially Consolidated Rules (IDPC Rules) and IDPC Form 1 unless otherwise specified.
The purpose of Schedule 9 is to address the concentration risk arising when a Dealer Member (Dealer) maintains significant exposures to the value of securities of an issuer company. Schedule 9 is designed to preserve a minimum level of residual capital within the Dealer in the event it might need to exit a concentrated position in a volatile market. Schedule 9 sets out how the capital charge to address concentration risk is determined and when the capital charge applies.
Schedule 9 quantifies an issuer exposure as an “amount loaned”, which can result from either long or short positions. The Schedule 9 methodology aggregates applicable inventory and client account amount loaned exposures and allows for risk-based adjustments to reduce the exposure. A concentration capital charge may apply when there is an over-exposure. An over-exposure occurs when the final adjusted amount loaned exceeds a specified threshold. This threshold limit is determined in relation to preconcentration risk-adjusted capital (RAC). Preconcentration RAC is RAC before securities concentration charge and minimum capital.
Schedule 9 is divided into the following three sections:
Schedule 9A and Schedule 9B exposures are initially calculated and reported separately in their respective schedules. The highest amount loaned exposures from Schedules 9A and 9B feed into the Schedule 9 Summary sheet to aggregate top exposures and calculate potential capital charges.
There are certain prescribed differences between Schedule 9A and 9B as follows:
Securities are included for testing on either Schedule 9A or Schedule 9B depending on the type of security and associated margin rate. As detailed below, most debt securities are tested on Schedule 9B, while most other securities are tested on Schedule 9A. Dealers may exclude certain securities from concentration testing if the exclusion criteria is met.
The securities that must be considered for Schedule 9A testing include:
Dealers may exclude from Schedule 9A testing:
The securities that must be considered for Schedule 9B testing include:
Dealers may exclude from Schedule 9B testing certain government debt securities and short-term commercial debt securities as described in the Notes and Instructions to Schedule 9B.
The securities that may be excluded from the concentration testing on both Schedule 9A and 9B are those securities that:
The Dealer determines the concentration amount loaned exposure to a particular issuer by aggregating:
The security positions contained in client accounts are included as an exposure only to the extent that the security positions were being relied on to collateralize a loan or an overdue balance. Fully paid for and excess margin securities that are required to be segregated are excluded from consideration.3
The Dealer determines the Schedule 9A and Schedule 9B amount loaned exposures separately for each issuer, according to the calculation requirements applicable to both tests. The Dealer separately calculates the long position amount loaned and the short position amount loaned as detailed below. The greater of the long and short position represents the unadjusted issuer amount loaned. The methodology for calculating the final adjusted amount loaned exposure for Schedule 9B issuers is different from Schedule 9A as described in section 5 of this guidance.
Appendix A provides an example of the calculation of concentration amount loaned exposures for an issuer on Schedule 9A and 9B, including how the exposure is reported in the Schedule 9 summary sheet.
For both Schedule 9A and Schedule 9B, the Dealer calculates the amount loaned exposure on the long positions as follows:
For Schedule 9A, the Dealer calculates the amount loaned exposure on the short positions as follows:
For Schedule 9B, short amount loaned exposures are determined in the same manner as long exposures.
For both Schedule 9A and Schedule 9B, the Dealer may deduct from the amount loaned on an individual client exposure in a security:
provided such securities are carried in readily saleable quantities only, and
The Schedule 9B methodology for determining the final adjusted amount loaned differs from the Schedule 9A methodology because it includes additional adjustments that allow:
These additional adjustments support the Schedule 9B testing methodology that scales debt securities with a normal margin requirement of <=10% into the Schedule 9 framework.5 For reference, these additional adjustments are detailed in the Notes and Instructions to Schedule 9B.
As noted in subsection 3.3 of this guidance, security positions that qualify for a margin offset may be excluded on both Schedule 9A and 9B. The remaining debt security positions in the Dealer’s own inventory may be net across maturity bands to calculate a net long (short) inventory position for an issuer. This netting allowance is subject to the defined seniority relationships. Individual client account positions are also eligible for this netting allowance. 6
The amount loaned on Schedule 9B may be reduced by applying risk-weighting adjustment factor(s). These adjustment factors are applied at the security issue level and determined according to minimum current credit ratings from a designated rating organization (DRO). Dealers should refer to Canadian securities laws to determine current DROs and equivalent credit ratings.7
Dealers may apply a 2-step methodology for determining the risk-weighting adjustment factor as follows:
aggregating the risk-weighted amount loaned that has been calculated for each individual debt security of the debt issuer,
or
Appendix B provides a simplified example of the calculation of a risk-weighted amount loaned for an aggregate issuer exposure using a weighted average adjustment factor.
For securities on Schedule 9B that qualify for the risk-weighted adjustment factor8 , the highest adjustment factor is 80%. If the Dealer applies an adjustment factor less than 80% it must:
The final adjusted amount loaned totals are carried forward from Schedule 9A and 9B to the Schedule 9 summary sheet. Any applicable concentration capital charges on over-exposures are calculated on the Schedule 9 summary sheet.
The concentration thresholds that apply are summarized in the chart below:
Amount loaned classification | Concentration threshold | |
---|---|---|
1. | Related or “non-arm’s length securities” | 1/3 pre-concentration RAC10 |
2. | Non-marginable securities of an issuer held in a cash account(s) | 1/3 pre-concentration RAC |
3. | Non-related or arm’s length marginable securities | 2/3 pre-concentration RAC |
4. | Additional exposures on non-related or arm’s length marginable securities. If the Dealer has already:
| 1/2 pre-concentration RAC |
The concentration capital charge is equal to 150% of the excess of the final adjusted amount loaned over the threshold, unless the over-exposure is eliminated within five business days of when it first occurs. Capital charges may not apply to all over-exposures and are subject to maximum limits as detailed below.
Concentration capital charges are only applied against:
Over-exposures measured against a concentration threshold of 1/3 RAC are ranked first on Schedule 9.
The maximum concentration capital charge limits for an over-exposure in a particular issuer are summarized in the chart below:
Concentration charge limits | Schedule 9A | Schedule 9B |
---|---|---|
Long positions | Lesser of:
| Lesser of:
|
Short positions | Amount calculated using concentration capital charge formula | Lesser of:
|
The Schedule 9 summary sheet must include the largest ten issuer positions and precious metals positions reported on Schedules 9A and 9B, whether or not a concentration capital charge applies. Where there are over-exposures in less than ten issuers, the Dealer must report the ten issuers with the highest final adjusted amount loaned. In this case, the ranked exposures reported may consist of:
Where there are over-exposures in more than ten issuers, the Dealer must report all such issuers.
Where there is an over-exposure in a security and the concentration charge would produce either a capital deficiency or an early warning violation, the Dealer must report the over-exposure concentration situation to CIRO on the date the over-exposure first occurs.
Section 4111 of the IDPC Rules requires the Dealer to maintain at all times risk adjusted capital greater than zero as calculated in accordance with Form 1. The Dealer’s internal controls should include monitoring potential concentration of securities on an ongoing basis. Dealers are reminded that, at a minimum, they are required under section 4114 to calculate their capital position on a weekly basis and retain evidence of such calculation. The calculation must consider the Schedule 9 requirements and any concentration charges.
IDPC Rules this Guidance Note relates to:
This Guidance Note replaces:
This guidance was published under Bulletin of Approval/Implementation 24-0084.
This guidance is related to the following Bulletin(s):
Appendix A – Calculation of concentration amount loaned exposures.
Appendix B – Calculation of a weighted average adjustment factor for the purpose of Schedule 9B.
Appendix C – Schedule 9 – Frequently asked questions (FAQs)
Appendix C – Schedule 9 – Frequently asked questions (FAQs)
Question | Topic | Response |
---|---|---|
1. Are mutual funds and exchange traded funds (ETFs) reported on Schedule 9A or 9B? Does it matter if the fund holds debt securities margined at <=10%? | Mutual funds and ETFs | Mutual funds and ETFs are reported on Schedule 9A. This applies even if the fund holds securities margined at <=10%. For example, a bond fund, which may hold an underlying portfolio of debt securities margined at <=10%, should be reported on Schedule 9A because the fund is not:
|
2. How are mutual funds and ETFs that meet the definition of “money market fund”, as defined in National Instrument 81-102 treated for the purposes of Schedule 9? | Mutual funds and ETFs qualifying as money market funds under NI 81-102. | Funds that meet the 81-102 “money market fund” requirements may be excluded from Schedule 9. If the fund does not meet the 81-102 money market fund requirements, any amount loaned exposure is reported on Schedule 9A. |
3. How are High Interest Savings Account Funds (HISA) treated for the purposes of Schedule 9? | HISA funds | HISA funds are typically coded, structured and settled like mutual funds or ETFs and are treated the same way as those fund types for the purposes of Schedule 9. Certain HISA funds can be treated as equivalent to qualifying money market funds for margin purposes and excluded from Schedule 9, If:
|
4. Are individual mutual funds and ETFs reported as separate issuer amount loaned exposures, or should Dealers aggregate each fund within a fund manager’s fund family as a single issuer exposure? | Mutual funds and ETFs | Dealers may report each individual fund as a separate exposure unless there is a legal or risk basis for consolidating separate funds from a single fund manager. This may be the case where it is determined that there is shared credit risk to the fund manager, or other counterparty. Related series or classes of the same fund should be consolidated. These different classes or series of the fund have substantially the same market risk and may be distinct only to the extent of management expenses, currency denominations, or listing status (unlisted vs. exchange-traded). |
5. Are individual structured products, such as principal protected notes (PPNs) and principal at risk notes (PARs) reported as separate issuer amount loaned exposures, or should Dealers aggregate all of the issuer’s structured products with other classes of securities of the issuer? | Structured products (PPNs, PARs) | When measuring concentration exposures to an issuer, structured products should be included with other classes of securities issued by that issuer. The investor purchasing the structured products has credit risk exposure to the issuer since the obligation to make payments associated with the structured products is the obligation of the issuer. The continued viability of the structured products is dependent on the financial health and creditworthiness of the issuer. |
6. Are convertible debt securities reported on Schedule 9A or 9B? | Convertible debt | Convertible debt securities may be reported on either Schedule 9A or 9B, depending on the normal margin requirement determined according to IDPC Rule subsection 5221(1). Where the normal margin requirement is >10%, the convertible debt security should be reported on Schedule 9A. For example, a convertible debt security maturing in 2 years with a market value more than 5% above par has a normal margin requirement of more than 10% in which case it should be reported on Schedule 9A. Where the normal margin requirement is <=10%, the convertible debt security should be reported on Schedule 9B. For example, a convertible debt security maturing in 2 years with a market value below par has a normal margin requirement of 6% and should be reported on Schedule 9B. |
7. Are the value of trades with financial institutions and other Dealers included in the concentration calculation? | Client position | Balances with acceptable institutions (AI), acceptable counterparties (AC), or regulated entities (RE), which are outstanding ten business days past settlement date must be included in the concentration calculation in the same manner as DAP cash accounts if:
For any accounts of financial institutions which are not AIs, ACs or REs, trades less than ten days past regular settlement date do not have to be included in the calculation of potential concentrations if they have been confirmed on or before settlement date by a settlement agent which qualifies as an AI. |
8. How is the client excess margin adjustment to amount loaned applied to concentration exposures? | Amount loaned adjustments, excess margin (Schedule 9, Notes and instructions, Note 7(iv)(b)) | The client margin excess can be used to reduce amount loaned for securities reported on either Schedule 9A or Schedule 9B but the total adjustments cannot exceed the client excess margin available. Alternatively, if the starting point of the calculations is securities or precious metal positions not required to be in segregation/safekeeping, this deduction has already been included in the loan value calculation as described in Schedule 9, Note (7)(iv)(b). For further detail regarding the client excess margin adjustment to amount loaned for purposes of determining concentration exposures, see CIRO Bulletin 24-0085 |
9. What are the restrictions related to the Schedule 9B additional netting allowance? | Additional netting allowance for Dealer Member’s own position and client position (Schedule 9B, Notes and instructions, Note 4) | When calculating the positions to include in Schedule 9B, the Dealer may only net long and short positions if:
The Dealer is not permitted to:
|
10. How do Dealers determine if a credit rating agency meets the DRO definition in Form 1, General notes and definitions? | Designated Rating Organization (DRO), (IDPC Rules, Form 1, General notes and definitions, Schedule 9B) | Dealers should refer to Canadian securities laws to determine current DROs and equivalent ratings. In 2012, the Canadian Securities Administrators granted DRO status to:
|
11. Are there any other acceptable sources (other than Canadian securities laws) for determining equivalent DRO ratings? | Designated Rating Organization (DRO), (IDPC Rules, Form 1, General notes and definitions, Schedule 9B) | For determining equivalent DRO credit ratings, Dealers may also refer to Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI), Capital Adequacy Requirements (CAR), Chapter 4 - Credit Risk - Standardized Approach, Section 4.2, External credit assessments and the mapping process. |
12. Do all debt securities tested under Schedule 9B qualify to use a risk-weighting adjustment factor? | Qualifying to use a risk-weighting adjustment factor (Schedule 9B, Notes and instructions, Note 6) | In order to qualify for a risk-weighting adjustment factor, commercial debt securities must be ranked senior to any outstanding equity securities from the same issuer in the statutory creditor hierarchy, or contractually. |
13. What period qualifies as “original maturities within 1 year or less”? | Original maturities within 1 year or less (Schedule 9B, Notes and instructions and Statement D, Statement of free credit segregation amount) | Original maturities within 1 year or less include maturities up to 370 days, provided the securities:
|
14. If the Dealer has access to multiple DRO rating provider credit ratings, which rating should be applied? | Multiple DRO current credit ratings | Dealer compliance does not necessarily require a subscription to all DROs that cover a debt security. Where the Dealer’s risk management relies on multiple DROs for a security and the Dealer applies ratings from different DROs for the security across Schedule 9 reporting periods, the multiple DRO methodology applies. Dealers should not “cherry-pick” the credit rating provided by different DROs and arbitrarily change from one DRO to another to take advantage of a higher rating. If two current credit ratings are available, the lower rating applies. If more than two current credit ratings are available, the Dealer should refer to the highest two ratings and apply the lower rating of the two. |
15. Bank paper such as GICs and term deposits are not typically rated by DROs. Can the deposit/issuer rating be applied for these products for the purposes of Schedule 9B and Statement D? | GICs and term deposit DRO ratings (Schedule 9B, Notes and instructions and Statement D, Statement of free credit segregation amount) | Where there is an issue-specific DRO rating, that rating applies. Where GICs and term deposit asset classes are not covered by DROs in security issue coverage, Dealers may apply equivalent minimum deposit/issuer DRO ratings provided these deposit-like securities rank as senior claims on the issuer. |
16. If a single issuer has amount loaned exposures on both Schedule 9A and 9B, are the exposures combined on the Schedule 9 Summary sheet when calculating the concentration charge? | Treatment of issuer amount loaned exposures on both Schedule 9A and 9B (Schedule 9, Notes and instructions, Note 9) | No, the issuer’s amount loaned exposures on Schedule 9A and 9B are treated as two separate amount loaned exposures and are not combined. However, it should be noted that the “additional exposures” threshold reductions detailed in Schedule 9, note 8(iv) also apply to amount loaned exposures from the same issuer that are calculated separately under Schedules 9A and 9B. For example, if there was a capital charge arising from an issuer on Schedule 9A due to the exposure exceeding 2/3 of preconcentration RAC, and the same issuer had an exposure on Schedule 9B that exceeded the ½ preconcentration RAC threshold, then a capital charge would also apply to the Schedule 9B exposure. The capital charge related to the Schedule 9B exposure would be calculated based on the ½ preconcentration RAC threshold. |
17. How is Schedule 9 reported in SIRFF for the audited Form 1 filing? | SIRFF reporting | For the audited Form 1 filing, the Dealer:
|
18. Can Dealers modify the formatting of the Schedule 9B PDF uploaded to SIRFF? | SIRFF reporting | Yes. Dealers may modify the formatting of Schedule 9B to support netting allowances and weighted average adjustment factors. |